West Bengal Assembly Speaker Blocks Resolution on Supreme Court-Pending SIR Dispute, Citing Jurisdictional Boundaries

In a decisive parliamentary maneuver, West Bengal Legislative Assembly Speaker Biman Banerjee has formally rejected a government-proposed resolution addressing alleged 'hardships' stemming from the Special Investigation Report (SIR) controversy. The Speaker's ruling, grounded in constitutional propriety, asserts that the Assembly lacks jurisdiction to deliberate on matters currently sub judice before the Supreme Court of India. This procedural intervention underscores the escalating tensions between state governance and judicial oversight, highlighting a critical test of institutional boundaries. The blocked resolution, introduced by the ruling state administration, sought to formally register grievances and potential socio-economic impacts linked to the SIR's implementation. Analysts interpret this development as a strategic move by the Speaker to preempt any legislative action that could be perceived as influencing or prejudicing ongoing judicial proceedings. The incident reflects broader patterns of inter-institutional friction in Indian federalism, where state assemblies increasingly navigate complex interfaces with central investigative mandates and apex court jurisdictions. This episode is likely to intensify political discourse on the separation of powers, while setting a procedural precedent for how regional legislatures engage with nationally adjudicated controversies.