Government Asserts Legal Compliance in Activist Detention Case Before Supreme Court

In a formal submission to the Supreme Court, government representatives have defended the detention of activist Sonam Wangchuk, asserting that all procedural safeguards were meticulously followed. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta presented the government's position, characterizing Wangchuk's public statements as "highly objectionable" for drawing comparisons between Ladakh's political representation and autonomous rights in regions like Tibet under Chinese administration. The government's legal argument frames the detention as a "preventive action" designed to halt repeated dissemination of what it deems sensitive rhetoric. Mehta emphasized that such measures "strike at the very purpose for which the National Security Act was enacted," suggesting the law's application carries "contextual meaning" tied to region-specific sensitivities. This judicial exchange highlights the ongoing tension between national security frameworks and civil liberties, with the government positioning the case as a necessary defense against statements it views as destabilizing to regional harmony. The Supreme Court's forthcoming assessment will scrutinize whether preventive detention protocols were lawfully applied or represent an overreach of state authority.