THE HAGUE: France on Thursday urged the United Nations top court to “clarify” international law relating to the fight against climate change, saying judges had a “unique opportunity” to provide a clear legal framework.
The International Court of Justice is holding historic hearings to craft a so-called “advisory opinion” on states’ responsibilities to fight climate change and the consequences for those damaging the environment.
“France is convinced that these advisory proceedings provide a unique opportunity for the court to contribute to identifying and clarifying international law in regard to the fight against climate change,” said Diego Colas, the country’s representative.
“Like many other countries, France has high expectations of these proceedings and the opinion that you will hand down,” added Colas.
He said that the impact of the ICJ’s opinion was “beyond doubt”.
France was one of more than 100 countries and organisations presenting at the ICJ, the biggest case ever before the world’s top court.
Critics say the ICJ’s advisory opinion, which will take months if not years to write, will lack teeth as it is non binding upon states and there is no means of enforcement.
Others hope the ICJ will lay down a legal precedent that will influence domestic climate legislation and litigation.
France warned in October that temperatures in the country were on track to rise by four degrees Celsius (seven degrees Fahrenheit) by 2100 due to global warming, wiping 10 points off French gross domestic product.
The government report said that 500,000 homes would come under threat because of a receding coastline by the end of the century.
France is aiming to be carbon neutral by 2050 and reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent in 2030 compared to 1990 levels.
“Without resolute action towards mitigation and adaptation, we rush headlong towards worsening climate change consequences, disastrous for both the environment and humans alike,” said Colas.

THE HAGUE: The top United Nations court took up the largest case in its history on Monday, when it opened two weeks of hearings into what countries worldwide are legally required to do to combat climate change and help vulnerable nations fight its devastating impact. After years of lobbying by island nations who fear they could simply disappear under rising sea waters, the UN General Assembly asked the International Court of Justice last year for an opinion on “the obligations of States in respect of climate change.”
Any decision by the court would be non-binding advice and couldn’t directly force wealthy nations into action to help struggling countries. Yet it would be more than just a powerful symbol since it could be the basis for other legal actions, including domestic lawsuits.
“We want the court to confirm that the conduct that has wrecked the climate is unlawful,” Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, who is leading the legal team for the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu, told The Associated Press.
In the decade up to 2023, sea levels have risen by a global average of around 4.3 centimeters (1.7 inches), with parts of the Pacific rising higher still. The world has also warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.3 Fahrenheit) since preindustrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels.
Vanuatu is one of a group of small states pushing for international legal intervention in the climate crisis.
“We live on the front lines of climate change impact. We are witnesses to the destruction of our lands, our livelihoods, our culture and our human rights,” Vanuatu’s climate change envoy Ralph Regenvanu told reporters ahead of the hearing.
The Hague-based court will hear from 99 countries and more than a dozen intergovernmental organizations over two weeks. It’s the largest lineup in the institution’s nearly 80-year history.
Last month at the United Nations’ annual climate meeting, countries cobbled together an agreement on how rich countries can support poor countries in the face of climate disasters. Wealthy countries have agreed to pool together at least $300 billion a year by 2035 but the total is short of the $1.3 trillion that experts, and threatened nations, said is needed.
“For our generation and for the Pacific Islands, the climate crisis is an existential threat. It is a matter of survival, and the world’s biggest economies are not taking this crisis seriously. We need the ICJ to protect the rights of people at the front lines,” said Vishal Prasad, of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change.
Fifteen judges from around the world will seek to answer two questions: What are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? And what are the legal consequences for governments where their acts, or lack of action, have significantly harmed the climate and environment?
The second question makes particular reference to “small island developing States” likely to be hardest hit by climate change and to “members of “the present and future generations affected by the adverse effects of climate change.”
The judges were even briefed on the science behind rising global temperatures by the UN’s climate change body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ahead of the hearings.